Get to know Cadenya
We’re developers who love to build. We set out to create a yes-code platform that makes building agents feel like the best parts of building software.
LangSmith Deployment is LangChain’s hosting for agents, the product that used to be called LangGraph Platform. You write the agent, in LangGraph or another framework, and its Agent Server runs it with durable checkpoints, resumable streaming, and a task queue. The bill has three parts: seats, traces, and the compute your deployments use.
A Dedicated Small deployment that runs all month comes to about $389 at the published rates, before seats and traces. The Plus plan includes one Serverless Small deployment for free.
Every figure comes from langchain.com/pricing and LangChain’s docs, checked on October 13, 2026. The dollar totals are arithmetic on the published rates, and LangChain’s usage calculator gives the official estimate.
What LangSmith Deployment costs
The plans:
| Plan | Price | What it adds |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | $0, 1 seat | Up to 5,000 base traces a month, then pay as you go |
| Plus | $39 a seat a month | Access to Deployment, up to 10,000 base traces a month, 1 free Serverless (Small) deployment |
| Enterprise | Custom | SSO and RBAC, among others |
Deployments bill in LangChain Standard Units (LSU), at $1.00 each. In dollars, that’s:
| What runs | Rate | In dollars |
|---|---|---|
| Runtime compute | 0.0675 LSU per vCPU-hour | $0.0675 per vCPU-hour |
| Runtime memory | 0.0090 LSU per GiB-hour | $0.009 per GiB-hour |
| Database compute | 0.177 LSU per vCPU-hour | $0.177 per vCPU-hour |
| Database memory | 0.025 LSU per GiB-hour | $0.025 per GiB-hour |
Deployments come in six sizes. Serverless Small, Medium, and Large have 0.8, 4, and 8 vCPUs and no database of their own. Dedicated Small, Medium, and Large have 3, 6, and 12 vCPUs for the runtime plus a database with 1, 2, and 4 vCPUs.
A month of one deployment
Take a Dedicated Small deployment (3 vCPUs and 6 GiB for the runtime, 1 vCPU and 4 GiB for the database) and run it for a 730-hour month:
| Part | Arithmetic | Monthly |
|---|---|---|
| Runtime compute | 3 vCPU x 730 h x $0.0675 | $147.83 |
| Runtime memory | 6 GiB x 730 h x $0.009 | $39.42 |
| Database compute | 1 vCPU x 730 h x $0.177 | $129.21 |
| Database memory | 4 GiB x 730 h x $0.025 | $73.00 |
| Total | about $389 |
Add $39 per seat and any traces past the plan’s allowance. A Dedicated Medium comes to about $779 the same way.
What you get for it
- Human-in-the-loop approvals. LangGraph interrupts pause the graph, and you resume it with the same thread ID.
- Any framework. LangSmith Deployment “is framework-agnostic”: LangGraph natively, and the Claude Agent SDK, Strands, CrewAI, AutoGen, or Google ADK through a wrapper.
- Durable execution. By default, Agent Server writes a checkpoint after each step (its
asyncdurability mode), so a thread’s state survives a restart. - Resumable streams. “Thread streaming also supports resumability: if a connection drops, reconnect with the last event ID to pick up where you left off.”
join_streamattaches to a thread or a run that’s already going. - Your agent as an MCP server, on Plus and Enterprise.
LangGraph deployment: LangGraph Platform and LangSmith Deployment options
How do you deploy a LangGraph agent? Through the LangGraph CLI, onto one of four LangSmith Deployment setups. “All infrastructure types use the same Agent Server runtime,” so the graph doesn’t change between them.
The CLI reads a langgraph.json that points at your compiled graph:
{
"$schema": "https://langgra.ph/schema.json",
"dependencies": ["."],
"graphs": {
"chat": "chat.graph:graph"
}
}
Then the commands go in this order:
langgraph dev“starts a lightweight local dev server (no Docker required),” with hot reloading and state saved to a local directory.langgraph upruns the server in Docker with PostgreSQL and Redis, for production-like tests. It needs a LangSmith API key, and a license key for production use.langgraph build -t my-imagebuilds the Agent Server Docker image you ship.langgraph deploybuilds and deploys to LangSmith Deployment in one step. It creates a Serverless deployment by default, and--deployment-type dedicatedpicks Dedicated.
Where the Agent Server runs is the choice:
| Setup | Who runs the Agent Servers | How you deploy | Plan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud | LangChain, on AWS and GCP | GitHub in the LangSmith UI, or langgraph deploy | Plus or above |
| Hybrid | You, with a LangChain-managed control plane | Your own infrastructure | Enterprise |
| Self-hosted with control plane | You, in your Kubernetes cluster | Next to self-hosted LangSmith | Enterprise |
| Standalone server | You, with Docker, Compose, or Kubernetes | Your own pipeline, no control plane | A LangSmith license |
Cloud deployments from GitHub can “automatically update deployment on push to branch.” A standalone server needs a DATABASE_URI for Postgres, which stores “assistants, threads, runs, persist thread state and long term memory,” and a REDIS_URI for streaming. For production, LangChain recommends Kubernetes with its Helm chart.
Every setup runs a graph you wrote. Cadenya runs the loop instead, so there’s no graph and no server to deploy.
What to plan for
- You still write the agent. Deployment runs your graph. The loop, the prompts, and the tools are your code.
- Resumed nodes run again. When you resume an interrupt, “the runtime restarts the entire node from the beginning”, so code before the
interrupt()call runs twice. - Limits. Requests to Cloud deployments are capped at 25 MB, and one thread runs one run at a time.
The alternatives
Where do you go if the seats or the metering don’t fit? It depends on whether you want to keep writing the agent.
Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
The closest match if you want to keep writing the agent. AgentCore runs any framework in a microVM per session and bills per second from $0.0895 per vCPU-hour with no minimum. AgentCore alternatives has the details.
Claude Managed Agents
No agent code to deploy: Anthropic runs the loop and a sandbox per session, and approvals set to always_ask pause the session, like interrupts. You pay $0.08 per session-hour while it runs, plus tokens. The trade is Claude only.
OpenAI’s Agents API
Also no agent code: OpenAI runs its Codex harness with OpenAI models, and it has no approval step of its own.
Cadenya
No agent code, and any model. Cadenya runs the loop and keeps the state: you point a tool set at your OpenAPI document or an MCP server, pick the model on a variation, and start an objective, with approvals set per tool set. It’s free for 1,000 loops a month and $49 for 50,000, where a loop is one LLM request, and there are no seats. What it offers that LangSmith Deployment doesn’t is at the end.
LangGraph on your own servers
LangGraph itself runs anywhere. With a Postgres checkpointer, a graph’s state survives restarts (the in-memory savers don’t: “When the process restarts, all checkpoints are lost”). You give up Agent Server’s queue, scaling, and console, and you run it like any other service.
Side by side
| LangSmith Deployment | Amazon Bedrock AgentCore | Claude Managed Agents | OpenAI Agents API | Cadenya | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Who writes the loop | You | You | Anthropic | OpenAI | Cadenya, configured by you |
| Approval step | Interrupts | Built-in hook | always_ask | None of its own | Per tool set |
| Models | Any your code calls | Any | Claude | OpenAI | Any provider you connect |
| Starting price | $39 a seat a month, plus runtime | Per second, no minimum | $0.08 per running hour, plus tokens | Tokens and sandbox time | $0 for 1,000 loops |
When to stay on LangSmith Deployment
Stay if your team wants to own the agent’s code, wants durable checkpoints and resumable streams, and wants one host for LangGraph and other frameworks. That combination is its strength.
What does Cadenya offer that LangSmith Deployment doesn’t?
LangSmith Deployment hosts the graph you write. Cadenya runs the agent itself, so there’s no graph to write, no deployment to size, and no seats to count. Here’s what that covers:
- No graph to write. You set the agent’s prompt, model, tool sets, and approvals on a variation, and Cadenya runs the loop: it calls the model, runs the tools, streams each reply, and compacts the context window when a conversation gets long.
- No deployment to size. There’s no Serverless or Dedicated size to pick, and no runtime vCPUs or database billed by the hour. Your app calls an API.
- No seats. Plus is $39 a seat a month before any runtime. Cadenya bills per loop, one LLM request: free for 1,000 a month, $49 a month for 50,000, then $0.0015 each. For the $389 a Dedicated Small deployment costs in a month, Growth covers more than 275,000 loops.
- Your OpenAPI document as the tools. On LangSmith Deployment, tools are your code. A Cadenya tool set turns every operation in an OpenAPI 3 document into a tool, re-checks the document each hour, filters the list, and loads tools on demand. MCP servers and plain HTTP endpoints work too.
- Approvals that don’t re-run code. A resumed LangGraph node runs again “from the beginning.” A Cadenya tool marked for approval pauses the objective on
toolApprovalRequested, and approving runs that one tool call. The answer can come from the API, a webhook handler that posts to Slack, or a person in the React chat widget, and a denial can carry a memo that steers the agent.
How objectives work shows an agent turn on Cadenya, and the free plan needs no card.
No account yet? A coding agent can create a temporary workspace with cadenya workspaces create --temporary, run its first objectives there, and hand you a link to claim it, as auth.md explains. To create an account, sign up at app.cadenya.com/signup, then copy your API key from the API keys page at app.cadenya.com/account/apiKeys.
Grow wherever AI goes next.
Start shipping agents that are equipped to evolve.